![]() ![]() None sound particularly realistic though Chimes can be quite useful, and Marimba is quite nice with the Reiteration (repeat) effect. The percs on the E are, IIRC, Chimes, Celesta, Guitar, Marimba, Xylophone and Banjo - all derived from the drawbar pitches, of course. Hook a leslie up to that bad boy and prepare for ignition. I can say this though, unless your a "B3 purist" who cant live without every nuance of the B3 sound, I would take the E-100. For people who take these organs with them on a show, I generally see them favor the M3 for its size.įor people who just want a hammond sound and a full sized organ to keep in a studio, I see the E-100. ![]() Hook one up to either, and they both have the "Hammond sound".īetween the two, I think it really comes down to a size factor. If your goal is to get a Hammond Tonewheel organ of full size to play comfortably at, then get the E-100. ![]() If your goal is to get as close to the B-3 sound you can get, then by all means get the M-3. It featured settings such as, Harp sustain and Cymbal brush. I believe that the pedals were monophonic. They had a few solid-state components as well. Very little, in terms of components, are original to the B3. The E-100's came much later, in the late 60's. The only differences other than size is the built-in speaker, the amplifier, and lack of foldback. You are correct that the M-3 is more like the B-3, and this is because the two are made using the same parts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |